Tegap tv malaysia11/7/2022 Water services were also gradually privatised, the results of which we see today, especially in the state of Selangor whose industry is fractured into four separate concession companies, and which has suffered as a consequence (I have written previously about the water problems in the state, to which the reader may refer). Malaysia followed suit in the 1990s by privatising a number of state-owned enterprises such as Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia Airlines, Telekom Malaysia, Indah Water Konsortium and Proton. The theory is that privatising public services would bring about greater efficiency, since private companies would have sufficient capital to invest towards improving infrastructure and other things necessary to ensure best service delivery, for which the government may not necessarily have the funds. The local council of Barnet is facing backlash against its proposed local government privatisation, a £1bil “One Barnet” scheme that will see up to 70% of its public services privatised. A similar approach has been adopted in the UK and is also being heavily opposed. Selangor has suggested that an independent evaluator should study the AES, assessing it for its feasibility, effectiveness and steps required for its implementation while Penang’s Chief Minister has asked for its suspension pending review.Įven more interesting are the second and third issues, of the privatisation of public services and the profits that will eventually be earned by the private companies. However, according to the Transport Minister, there has been a drastic fall in the number of offences in the 14 areas where the cameras have already been installed. On the first point, Member of Parliament William Leong states that other factors also cause road accidents, including the lack of motorcycle lanes, pedestrian crossings and proper street lighting. Criticisms are levelled on the basis of the following: one, that it is not an appropriate solution to solve road accidents, injuries and death two, that the project is being privatised at all and three, that these two companies will stand to profit with large margins at the expense of people’s summons fines. This has drawn a number of detractors, chiefly from Pakatan leaders. (Facts and figures as reported by The Malaysian Insider on November 6, 2012). This is just for the break-even amount to make any additional profit on top of this, additional summonses would need to be issued. A five-year term is given to the companies. But in order to hit this RM700mil, a total of 13.6 million summonses of RM300 each would have to be issued. The amount due to both companies comes up to RM700mil in total RM80mil each for the first five million summonses and RM540mil under the second tier of the agreement. However, the issue has more to do with the financial benefits accrued to the companies under the agreement. In an interview, Dr Radin Umar Radin Sohaidi, who headed the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research and came up with the AES, states that its objective is to eventually reduce speed-related and red light-running “Killed and Seriously Injured” cases ( The Star, November 11, 2012). Under the agreement, cameras, which are able to automatically capture images of cars either speeding or running the red light, will be installed in all states of the country over the next 18 months. The controversy is centred on a traffic summons service that is privatised to two companies, ATES Sdn Bhd and Beta Tegap, under a Public-Private Partnership with the Road Transport Department ( JPJ). The Automated Enforcement System (AES) has emerged as another issue which the Pakatan-led states, namely Penang, Selangor, Kedah and Kelantan, have come to a common policy agreement not to implement for the time being. (From Penang Monthly, December 2012 issue)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |